Minutes of meeting May 2,
2002
Submitted by George F. Green,
D.D.S.
Introduction - Dr. Gantes and Dr. Yamada
Introduction of previous speakers at study club: Dr. Robert Simon, prosthodontist / private practice, and Dr. Wayne Campagni, prosthodontist / Loma Linda Dental School.
Announcements:
June 5 - orthodontic meeting . . .
please invite your orthodontist. Dr. Joe Caruso (chairman / ortho dept. Loma
Linda) will discuss the Newtom / radiographic imaging device.
October 3 - Staff meeting (to
replace originally scheduled meeting with Torsten Jemt)
November 7 - Literature review
December 12 - Torsten Jemt /
register early / Long Beach Marriot Hotel / "digital impression
making "
Tonight's presentation is by Dr. Guillermo Bernal, prosthodontist, Loma Linda Dental School
Implant Restorations: Cemented or Screw-Retained? - Dr. Guillermo Bernal
At Loma Linda Dental School, about 80% of implant cases are external-hexed (Branemark) and 20% internal-hexed (ITI).
A. Historical Background
1. 1981 (20 yrs
ago) - we know implants work, lowest long-term maintenance of any tooth
replacement
procedure
2. 1994 -
partially edentulous cases can also be successfully treated with implants
3. Evolution of
screw-retained (prosthetic preference) to cement retained (more esthetic /
porcelain occlusal)
4. Problems of
screw loosening solved with WP fixtures, pre-loading of screws
5. 1996 - single
tooth implants successful, decrease in screw loosening by:
use of gold alloy screw in place of Ti screw
alteration of occlusal scheme (decrease area of occlusal table, decrease
cusp inclination)
6. Currently, at
Loma Linda, primarily use custom abutments / fixture-level impressions
B. Treatment Modalities
1. Screw -
Retained
Advantages
1. retrievability
re-tighten abutments
simplify replacement of fractured components
perform hygiene
2. limited inter-occlusal space = INDICATION
for cemented restorations: need 5mm with external hex, 6mm with internal hex
with screw-retained, can restore with
3. Avoid sub-gingival excess cement
Disadvantages
1. requires precise implant placement
2. necessary passive fit difficult to achieve on multiple units, particularly
difficult with internal hex cases
Dr. Wayne Campagni: "A casting is a miracle"
Torsten Jemt: study demonstrated "misfits" of 75-250 microns resulted
in no additional bone loss,
but did result in screw-loosening and fractures
3. screw holes in occlusal surface
compromised esthetics
disruption of occlusal surface
2. Cement -
Retained
Advantages
1. improved esthetics, maintain occlusal scheme
2. passive fit easier to achieve (Guichet IJOMI 2000; 15:239 better stress
distribution with
cement-retained)
3. physical strength of occlusal porcelain maintained
Disadvantages
1. removal of sub-gingival excess cement ( could use lateral set-screw in place
of cement)
2. abutment screw loosening
Jemt: 10-56% screw loosening with Ti screws
original hex height = 0.75 mm, currently WP hex height = 1.0 mm
must use torque driver to deliver greater than 20 N-cm (must have torque driver calibrated)
internal spline, Morse taper = no screw loosening problems
3. non-retrievability
Factors Influencing Retention
1. total convergence angle of abutments
2. abutment surface area and height
3. abutment surface texture
4. type of cement (following in order of least to most retentive:)
temp-bond with vaseline
tempbond , Zinc Phosphate (statistically similar)
Improv (SteriOss)
C. Conclusions
1. Screw-reatined
is treatment of choice when implant position is
optimal, and is mandatory
with limited inter-occlusal space
2. Passive fit =
difficult to achieve with conventional techniques, increase in risk of screw
loosening with
increase in misfit
3. Adequate
occlusion in repeatable position, narrow occlusal table, minimal cusp
inclination = may
decrease forces leading to better prosthetic stability
4. NP implants
with external hex are contraindicated in posterior areas
5. Implant
location and esthetics influence choice of cement retained or screw retained.
6. New implant
designs may decrease risk of abutment screw loosening making cement and screw
more
reliable.
7. New screws
with increased yield strength require torque drivers.
8. Lateral set
screws: improve retrievability, increase cost, difficult to manipulate
clinically
9. Cement
-retained = problems with removal of excess cement leading to soft tissue
problems
10. total angle
of convergence usually more parallel than ideal creating difficulties with
retrievability, even
with temporary cement.
11. Use of die
spacer increases likelihood of passive fit.
12. With short
abutments: use auxillary retentive features ( grooves, boxes, etc.)
13. Permanent
cement or Improv may be indicated for cement-retained.
14. TempBond
with vaseline may be suitable for splinted teeth where retrievability is
necessary.
15. Blood
contamination during cementation can drastically reduce cement strength.
D. Questions and Answers
In the case
presented, why were the upper implants splinted?
To compensate
for minimal retention: short abutment length and large crown:"root"
ratio.
What is the
ideal convergence angle for Procera abutments?
Depends upon
length of abutment . . . with short abutment, need less convergence (2 deg - 6
deg). With
long abutment,
can increase convergence to 15 deg.
Misfit: most critical in horizontal dimension.
Meeting adjourned at 8:40PM